Notes from the House
Note 05/Audience
Your audience is telling you what your brand is.
Engagement data is usually read as performance when it is closer to testimony.
Comments, shares, saves, searches, questions and conversations aren't simply engagement metrics. They're evidence of what people believe is worth noticing.
Most organizations read this material for volume. How many, how fast, compared to what. That reading is useful for judging distribution and almost useless for judging meaning, because it collapses everything a person said into whether they said anything at all.
Underneath the counts is a far more valuable document: the language your audience uses when they describe you to someone else. A share is an act of authorship — a person attaching their own credibility to your work and, usually, adding a sentence explaining why. That sentence is the brand as it actually exists in the world, unmediated by anything you approved.
The same is true of the questions people ask repeatedly. A question that keeps recurring is not a support failure. It is a signal about where your explanation and their understanding diverge, and often about what they actually came for versus what you assumed they wanted.
Saves are more interesting still. A save is a commitment to return, made privately, with nothing performed for anyone. What people save tells you which part of your work they consider durable enough to need later — which is a much sharper question than what they applauded in the moment.
None of this argues that audiences should set strategy. They cannot; they do not know what you are capable of, what it costs, or what you intend to become. Handing them the wheel produces a brand that chases its own reflection.
But the gap between the position a company believes it holds and the position its audience keeps describing is one of the most useful measurements available, and almost nobody takes it deliberately. Closing that gap sometimes means changing the message. Just as often it means recognizing that people have identified something genuinely valuable that the company had been treating as incidental.
The evidence is already sitting in your own channels, in plain language, written by the people you are trying to reach. It is worth reading as testimony rather than as scoreboard.

Danielle Fischer/Founder, Deegan
See something differently?
Start a conversation